Continuation funds provide liquidity to limited partners (LPs) by acting as GP-led secondary transactions. In these structures, a general partner (GP) establishes a new fund vehicle to hold assets from an existing fund that is approaching the end of its term.
LPs receive liquidity through the following mechanisms:
- The Cash Exit Option: When a GP initiates the transfer of assets into a continuation vehicle, existing LPs are offered a choice. They can opt for a cash exit, allowing them to realize gains and receive immediate liquidity based on a reset valuation of the assets.
- Secondary Market Sales: The GP facilitates the sale of existing LP interests to new institutional investors. This process effectively replaces the capital of exiting LPs with that of new investors who wish to participate in the assets’ future growth.
- Asset Valuation: To ensure LPs receive a fair price during the liquidity event, the process typically involves independent third-party valuations and fairness opinions. This protects stakeholders by establishing a fair market price for otherwise illiquid assets.
- Flexible Exit Timing: Rather than being forced into a binary outcome or a premature asset sale at the end of a traditional fund’s life, LPs gain the flexibility to recycle capital while the GP continues managing high-performing assets.
Related FAQs
-
Which Investment Bank Type is Best for Mid-market Company Sales?
Read More »: Which Investment Bank Type is Best for Mid-market Company Sales?For mid-market company sales, boutique investment banks are often considered the superior choice due to several structural and service-oriented advantages. While bulge bracket banks offer global scale, boutique firms like Zaidwood Capital specialize in the high-touch, senior-led advisory that middle-market…
-
How do Fee Structures Differ between Boutique and Bulge Bracket Banks?
Read More »: How do Fee Structures Differ between Boutique and Bulge Bracket Banks?The fee structures for investment banking differ significantly between boutique and bulge bracket banks, particularly regarding flexibility, customization, and how incentives are aligned with client outcomes. According to the provided content, the differences include: Related FAQs
-
What are the Pros and Cons of Boutique vs Bulge Bracket M&a Advisory?
Read More »: What are the Pros and Cons of Boutique vs Bulge Bracket M&a Advisory?When evaluating boutique vs bulge bracket investment banking, the choice depends on your transaction size, strategic priorities, and the level of service you require. Below are the primary pros and cons of each model based on the guide: Boutique M&A…
-
When should a Founder Choose a Boutique Advisory Firm over a Bulge Bracket?
Read More »: When should a Founder Choose a Boutique Advisory Firm over a Bulge Bracket?A founder should consider choosing a boutique advisory firm over a bulge bracket institution when their strategic priorities favor personalized service, industry specialization, and transaction speed. Key scenarios where a boutique firm is the preferred choice include: Related FAQs
-
How does 2026 M&a Deal Volume Compare to Previous Years?
Read More »: How does 2026 M&a Deal Volume Compare to Previous Years?Based on the provided reports and forecasts, 2026 is projected to be a year of robust recovery and renewed momentum for M&A deal volume compared to recent years. Following a period of economic adjustment, the market is expected to rebound…