When should a Company Use Mezzanine Financing Instead of Equity?

A company should consider using mezzanine financing instead of equity when looking to fund growth or acquisitions while minimizing the drawbacks of traditional equity raises. According to the provided guide, the primary reasons to choose mezzanine financing include:

• Preservation of Control: Unlike equity financing, which entails full dilution and often requires giving up board seats, mezzanine debt allows existing shareholders to retain ownership and operational control. Equity participation via warrants is typically limited and deferred.
• Lower Cost of Capital: Mezzanine financing is generally more cost-effective than equity. While mezzanine all-in costs range from 10% to 18%, equity investors typically target a much higher internal rate of return (IRR) of 20% to 30%.
• Tax Deductibility: The cash interest component of mezzanine debt is tax-deductible, providing an after-tax cost advantage. In contrast, dividends and capital appreciation for equity investors are not deductible.
• Bridging Valuation Gaps: Mezzanine debt acts as an efficient instrument for bridging gaps in competitive processes when senior debt capacity (typically 3-4x EBITDA) is exhausted but the company does not want to issue more equity.
• Flexible Repayment: It offers flexible options such as payment-in-kind (PIK) interest, which preserves cash flow for operational needs by compounding value for lenders rather than requiring immediate cash outflows.

• Choosing the Right Mezzanine Debt Structures: Key Considerations